J.R.'S RINK RANTS:
With “Avery Rule”
in place NHL should extend drug testing to League Office
By Jason Reed
Hockeytalk.bizDoes anyone
else think that this rule is a freakin’ joke? Can anyone tell me what
Sean Avery did that was against the rules? I’ve watched this thing over
and over again and I still can’t figure out how he broke any rule in the
book. Obviously he didn’t since they NHL decided to add a rule in his
honor. What a bunch of BLEEP!
Let me break this down for you. Sean Avery was NOT in the crease. Nor
did he touch goalie Martin Brodeur in any way. It should be noted,
however, that Brodeur did knock Avery in the face. I don’t recall seeing
a penalty for that. I guess that I’m going to have to go back and look
at the play again just to make sure. Nope. Still no penalty.
So, if Avery wasn’t in the crease and he didn’t come into contact with
the goalie, how in the world did he do anything that could be construed
as interfering with the goalie. What I saw was a forward that was doing
everything he could to screen the goaltender and the way I know hockey,
forwards are encouraged to screen the goalie. That’s how goals are
scored, as a matter of fact.
Senior Executive Vice President and Director of Hockey Operations Colin
Campbell issued a statement about the League’s position. It is
considered an interpretation of Rule 75, concerning goaltender
interference.
"An unsportsmanlike conduct minor penalty (Rule 75) will be interpreted
and applied, effective immediately, to a situation when an offensive
player positions himself facing the opposition goaltender and engages in
actions such as waving his arms or stick in front of the goaltender's
face, for the purpose of improperly interfering with and/or distracting
the goaltender as opposed to positioning himself to try to make a play."
Barry Melrose, on Sportscenter Monday night, said that the situation was
embarrassing. I agree with Melrose that what Avery did was a bit odd,
but then, should be expect anything else from this guy? I certainly
don’t. But I also still stand by my first three paragraphs—Avery didn’t
do anything that was against the rules. He was simply screening the
goalie and as long as he stayed out of the crease and as long as he
didn’t make contact with the goalie then I believe that he was well
within his rights to do what he did.
Some may say that no one had ever done it before, so therefore it must
not be legal. My comeback would be that until Ron Hextall scored a goal,
no goalie had ever lit the lamp. So, seeing that logic all the way
through…a goalie scoring a goal should be illegal. Right?
That argument isn’t right and neither is the argument that the Avery
rule is a good thing. I respect Avery for going out night after night
and doing whatever he can to help his team win a game. Keep up the good
work Avery and even though it looks as if nothing good has come out of
this, at least your name will be attached to the rule books from now
until the end of time.
EMAIL JASON:
JASON@REEDWRITING.NET
BACK TO JASON REED MAIN PAGE
JASON'S BLOG
HOCKEYTALK HOME
|
JR'S RINK RANTS
No-holds barred takes on the game from JR
|

NEW!
2/19 |
RADIO:
Josh Brewster on the Jason Reed Show
LISTEN ONLINE |
More Rants:
Why is Everyone
So Down on Chris Pronger?
Ray Emery and
the Man
in the Mirror
Malkin & Crosby
Light Up Broadway
Ovechkin a Star,
But Lengthy Deals Invite Trouble
Things I Miss;
Or, What About My Needs?
Crawford Must Go
The Sens, the
Pens Plus a Couple of Friends
Eric
Lindros to the Hall of Fame? Yeah, Right...
The Target Test

EMAIL HOCKEYTALK!






Write for us!

|